| |
Links in this
section:
Introduction Fundamentals of the TEM technique Beam-sample interaction The Analytical TEM Detector Protection Qualitative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Microanalysis Examples (1) Microanalysis Examples (2) Microanalysis Examples (3) Summary
|
Examples of Microanalysis in the TEM
Quantitative Analysis of areas of varying film thickness
When analysing samples, a number of practical issues arise.
-
Samples are
often inhomogeneous and it is advisable to take measurements at more than
one point.
-
Sample self
absorption can usually be neglected for X-rays greater than 1.5keV in energy
but may be significant for low energy peaks from B,C,O,N,F,Na.
-
Therefore, it
is expected that if the sample is of a thickness where matrix corrections
need to be applied, it is important to enter thickness and density values
into the INCA TEM quant set up. Thicknesses may be calculated by a number of
imaging, diffraction or EELS techniques in the AEM (see Williams and
Carter).
-
Some materials
are beam sensitive. In these cases, it is necessary to adjust beam current
and count times accordingly.
-
Any spectral
artefacts caused by the microscope, sample holder and sample grid should be
taken into consideration.
As an example,
Figure 6 shows data collected from an aluminium oxide film of varying
thickness. When a spectrum taken from a thin area is analyzed, it
gives a concentration ratio close to that expected from the stoichiometry of
the compound. Data collected from a thicker area shows the effect of
increased absorption of the O Kα peak. The analysis result would suggest
that the composition has changed, whereas this is purely a consequence of
not making a correction for specimen thickness. If a sample does have
variable thickness then it is important to determine the likely effects of
absorption by trying different thickness and densities in the correction
program.
Table 1 shows quantitative analysis from an aluminium alloy (Ti-47% Al “A”)
analysis using an INCAEnergy TEM system. It can be seen that the results
from different points are consistent and the mean value of several point
analyses can be used to improve the precision if the material is expected to
be homogeneous. A single point would not show whether the analysis was
representative of the sample.
| Spectrum |
Al |
Ti |
Nb |
Mo |
W |
Total |
| Spectrum 1 |
47.09 |
49.86 |
2.13 |
0.43 |
0.48 |
100 |
| Spectrum 2 |
47.83 |
49.04 |
2.14 |
0.66 |
0.32 |
100 |
| Spectrum 3 |
47.33 |
49.46 |
1.96 |
0.59 |
0.67 |
100 |
| Spectrum 4 |
48.72 |
48.38 |
2.08 |
0.25 |
0.58 |
100 |
| Mean |
44.74 |
49.19 |
2.08 |
0.48 |
0.51 |
100 |
| Standard dev. |
0.72 |
0.63 |
0.08 |
0.18 |
0.15 |
|
| Maximum |
48.72 |
49.86 |
2.08 |
0.66 |
0.67 |
|
| Minimum |
47.09 |
48.38 |
1.96 |
0.25 |
0.32 |
|
| Sample: Ti-47% Al “A”.
Data from M Phaneuf, L. Weaver, G Carpenter. (Fibics Inc.) |
Table 1
Back | Next
|