Links in this section:

 

Introduction
Evolution of WDS technique
Basics of WDS
Diffraction
Crystals
Detectors & Geometry
Comparison of EDS and WDS
Qualitative Analysis
Quantitative Analysis
Mapping
Summary

 

Wavelength Dispersive Microanalysis

 

Introduction

 

Electron probe X-ray microanalysis techniques (Wavelength Dispersive X-ray and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometries WDS and EDS, respectively) use the characteristic X-rays generated from a sample bombarded with electrons to identify the elemental constituents comprising the sample. Both techniques generate a spectrum in which the peaks correspond to specific X-ray lines and the elements can be easily identified. Quantitative data can also be obtained by comparing peak heights or areas in the unknown with a standard material.

 

Of the two methods, EDS is more commonly employed. Data collection and analysis with EDS is a relatively quick and simple process because the complete spectrum of energies is acquired simultaneously. Using WDS, the spectrum is acquired sequentially as the full wavelength range is scanned. Although it takes longer to acquire a full spectrum, the WD technique has much improved resolution compared to EDS. Typical resolution of an ED detector is 70 to 130 eV (depending on the element), whereas peak widths in WD are 2 to 20 eV. The combination of better resolution and the ability to deal with higher count rates allows WDS to detect elements at typically an order of magnitude lower concentration than EDS.

 

While the WDS technique has always been appreciated for its higher resolution and trace element capability, it has been traditionally viewed as more complex to set up, and WDS data more tedious to obtain and interpret than EDS.

 

And, in the past, it was.

 

Next