Navigation to sections:

 

The Microanalysis System

What makes a Good Detector?

The Pulse Processor

 

Links in this section

 

Role of the pulse processor
Analog pulse shaping
Time variant shaping
Digital pulse shaping
Fixed process time
Adaptive pulse shaping
Resolution & count rate
Pulse pile-up protection
Comparing different pulse processors
Summary

 

The pulse processor

 

Processors which use adaptive pulse shaping

 

It is possible to use variable averaging times to measure the size of each step. Events that arrive far apart can be measured with more noise averaging than events arriving close together (Fig. 18b). This produces a spectrum where each peak is built up of many Gaussian shapes with a distribution of resolutions determined by the distribution of the timing of the arrival of events on the voltage ramp.

 

 

At low input rates this type of processor will deliver similar resolution to a fixed processor using a long process time. However, as the input rate is increased the adaptive shaper begins to use shorter averaging times and the resolution becomes worse, although the acquisition rate is better than with a fixed process time. The adaptive pulse shaper thus ensures efficient measurement of as many X-rays as possible. The maximum acquisition rate that this type of processor can achieve will still be controlled by the shortest time allowed to measure a voltage step. This will be similar to the maximum count rate achieved by a fixed process time processor using its shortest process time.

 

Using this type of shaping the analyst loses control over resolution of the spectrum. The resolution varies with count rate, for example when moving from one phase to another, or with any change in beam current. ‘Strobing’ cannot be used to measure resolution because the averaging time is variable. As a consequence resolution and peak shape are poorly defined and this compromizes the accuracy of spectrum processing.

 

Back | Next