Navigation to sections:

 

The Microanalysis System

What makes a Good Detector?

The Pulse Processor

 

Links in this section:

 

Manganese resolution
Low energy resolution
Fluorine resolution
Incomplete charge collection
Carbon resolution
Fe55 source
Changes with time
Geometry
Summary

 

What makes a good detector?

 

Detector performance changes with time

 

A major cause of detector degradation over time is the build up of contaminants that absorb X-rays before they can be detected by the crystal. Common examples include the condensation of oil on the collimator or detector window and ice forming on the face of the crystal. These contaminants will cause preferential absorption and a drop-off in sensitivity for low energy X-rays.

 

Ice forms on the cold crystal due to the migration and condensation of any water molecules in the detector vacuum. Two sources of water vapor exist: impurities present during manufacture, and molecules that migrate through the window when the detector is exposed to high vapor pressures. Modern manufacturing techniques mean that when installed, a detector vacuum should be free of water molecules. In SEMs where variable vacuum or environmental modes are used, the detector spends time in conditions where water is present in the microscope chamber. Some types of polymer thin window, which are predominant in modern EDS detectors, have been shown to degrade and become porous under conditions where water molecules are present.

 

A gradual decrease in low energy sensitivity over time will result in a decrease in the height of peaks at low energy. This can be checked by monitoring the relative height of K and L lines from a transition metal element. The ratio of L to K line heights from pure nickel measured at 20kV is a common test used. A more sensitive test for the presence of ice on a crystal is to look at the L spectrum from pure Cr. The L line spectrum consists of the Ll line at 0.5keV, and the Lα line at 0.571keV. The Lα line is on the high energy side of the oxygen absorption edge (energy 0.531keV) whilst the Ll line is on the low energy side. Therefore CrLα X-rays are much more efficiently absorbed by ice than CrLl X-rays. On a detector with little or no ice on the crystal face the Lα line should be higher than the Ll line (Fig. 11b). On a detector which has ice built up on the crystal the Ll line will be higher (Fig. 11a). 

 

The ice must be removed to regain the light element sensitivity of a detector. This can be done in two ways. If the detector is thermally cyclable it can be allowed to warm up. When the crystal starts to warm the ice will sublime and the vapor will disperse into the vacuum. When the detector is cooled down again the water vapor will normally condense within the dewar because this area cools down first.

 

This technique is time-consuming, requiring the liquid nitrogen reservoir in the dewar to be exhausted which can take a number of days, or to speed up the process, the detector can be removed from the column and the nitrogen poured out. Some detectors have a built-in heating circuit called a conditioner. This circuit warms up the crystal enough to sublime off any ice. Conditioning can be done whilst the detector is cooled down on the microscope column, and can remove any ice in as little as 2 hours.

 

Back | Next